From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Blake

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 24, 2012
2012-MO-043 (S.C. Oct. 24, 2012)

Opinion

2012-MO-043

10-24-2012

William D. Curtis, Respondent, v. Sandra Morris Blake, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brandon T. Blake, Petitioner.

Thomas J. Keaveny, II and Amy B. Rothschild, both of Keaveny Law Firm, of Charleston, for Petitioner. Robert Norris Hill, of Newberry, Mark Brandon Tinsley, of Gooding & Gooding, of Allendale, and C. Bradley Hutto, of Williams & Williams, of Orangeburg, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Heard October 16, 2012

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Orangeburg County No. 2011-191906, J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge.

Thomas J. Keaveny, II and Amy B. Rothschild, both of Keaveny Law Firm, of Charleston, for Petitioner.

Robert Norris Hill, of Newberry, Mark Brandon Tinsley, of Gooding & Gooding, of Allendale, and C. Bradley Hutto, of Williams & Williams, of Orangeburg, for Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals affirming the denial of Petitioner's motion for a new trial. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Blake

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 24, 2012
2012-MO-043 (S.C. Oct. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Curtis v. Blake

Case Details

Full title:William D. Curtis, Respondent, v. Sandra Morris Blake, as Personal…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 24, 2012

Citations

2012-MO-043 (S.C. Oct. 24, 2012)