Opinion
12 Civ. 6529 (AT) (AJP)
12-06-2016
JONATHAN R. CURSHEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION :
Jonathan R. Curshen, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck. After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Peck issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R"), proposing that Petitioner's petition be denied. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. Dunham v. City of New York, No. 11 Civ 1223, 2013 WL 929029, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2013). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Peck's R & R in its entirety. Petitioner's petition is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner.
SO ORDERED. Dated: December 6, 2016
New York, New York
/s/_________
ANALISA TORRES
United States District Judge