From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Tysens Park Apartments

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2001-05439

Submitted October 31, 2001.

December 3, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated March 27, 2001, which granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 510(3) to change the venue of this action from Kings County to Richmond County.

Bosco, Bisignano Mascolo, Staten Island, N Y (William J. Barillari and James A. Maleady of counsel), for appellants.

Kiley, Kiley Kiley, Great Neck, N.Y. (James D. Kiley of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see, CPLR 511[d]).

The Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants' motion for a change of venue. All of the witnesses mentioned by the defendants were their own employees, whose convenience is not a factor in considering a change of venue based on CPLR 510(3) (see, Cilmi v. Greenberg Trager, Toplitz, Herbst, 273 A.D.2d 266). The order must therefore be reversed and the motion denied.

BRACKEN, P.J., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, SMITH and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curry v. Tysens Park Apartments

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Curry v. Tysens Park Apartments

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CURRY, ET AL., appellants, v. TYSENS PARK APARTMENTS, LLC, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 907

Citing Cases

Tsuruda v. 6810 Equities Inc.

"The convenience of 'defendants themselves, or their employees, . . . is not a factor in considering a change…

Palermo v. White

The movants failed to satisfy their burden of demonstrating that the convenience of material witnesses and…