From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Fread

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jul 21, 2010
CASE NO. 5:10CV00154 JMM/BD (E.D. Ark. Jul. 21, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:10CV00154 JMM/BD.

July 21, 2010


ORDER


The Court has received the Partial Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. Plaintiff has filed his objections and has requested leave of court to file an amended complaint striking the Insurance Company as a defendant and more clearly stating his claims against Defendant Pitts.

The Court will allow Plaintiff to file his amended complaint. The Court declines to adopt the Partial Recommended Disposition, in part, as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Pitts.

The Court concludes that the Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings as to the claims against the Arkansas County Jail Insurance Company.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against the Arkansas County Jail Insurance Company are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to file his amended complaint more clearly setting forth his allegations against Defendant Pitts within fifteen (15) days of the entry of this Order

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Curry v. Fread

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jul 21, 2010
CASE NO. 5:10CV00154 JMM/BD (E.D. Ark. Jul. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Curry v. Fread

Case Details

Full title:CARL CURRY ADC # 84737 PLAINTIFF v. ROBBIE FREAD, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jul 21, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 5:10CV00154 JMM/BD (E.D. Ark. Jul. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

Reynolds v. Semple

See Curry v. Fread, No. 5:10CV00154 JMM/BD, 2010 WL 2926039, at *2 (E.D. Ark. July 13, 2010) ("Because…