From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Battistotti

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
Nov 3, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 1012 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2004)

Summary

In Curry, this court found that the landlord committed fraud by falsely registering the apartment's rent-regulatory status.

Summary of this case from WAI CHAN v. GAO XIAO YING

Opinion

November 3, 2004.


Landlord and Tenant — Rent Regulation — Tenant was subject to significant rent overcharges and was entitled to an abatement for conditions in his apartment. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 213-a (Actions to be commenced within four years; residential rent overcharge).


Summaries of

Curry v. Battistotti

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
Nov 3, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 1012 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2004)

In Curry, this court found that the landlord committed fraud by falsely registering the apartment's rent-regulatory status.

Summary of this case from WAI CHAN v. GAO XIAO YING
Case details for

Curry v. Battistotti

Case Details

Full title:Curry v. Battistotti

Court:Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Nov 3, 2004

Citations

5 Misc. 3d 1012 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2004)
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51355

Citing Cases

ZB Prospect Realty LLC v. France

The Rent Guidelines Board ("RGB") sets the applicable renewal rates, N.Y.C. Admin. Code §26-510(b), which the…

WAI CHAN v. GAO XIAO YING

Case law, however, allows tenants to challenge records before the four-year period preceding the filing of an…