From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jan 10, 2008
CA 07-0211-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 10, 2008)

Summary

holding that there "can be no doubt that plaintiff has a colorable claim of mental impairment" as the ALJ had implicitly determined that one of the claimant's severe impairments was borderline intellectual functioning

Summary of this case from Richardson v. Colvin

Opinion

CA 07-0211-CG-C.

January 10, 2008


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated December 20, 2007 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

Curry v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jan 10, 2008
CA 07-0211-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 10, 2008)

holding that there "can be no doubt that plaintiff has a colorable claim of mental impairment" as the ALJ had implicitly determined that one of the claimant's severe impairments was borderline intellectual functioning

Summary of this case from Richardson v. Colvin

finding that there was "no doubt that plaintiff has a colorable claim of a mental impairment" where the ALJ incorporated a claimant's cognitive limitations into the RFC assessment

Summary of this case from Moore v. Berryhill
Case details for

Curry v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA R. CURRY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

CA 07-0211-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 10, 2008)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Colvin

As the ALJ noted in his decision, Dr. Smith treated Richardson for anxiety and depression; Dr. Warren…

Moore v. Berryhill

And courts often conclude that a claim of mental impairment is colorable where intellectual limitations have…