From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curran v. Fresh Meadows Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 22, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, as the record contains no evidence that the defendant either created or had notice, actual or constructive, of the allegedly dangerous condition which caused the injured plaintiffs injuries (see, Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc., 248 A.D.2d 436; Bradish v. Tank Tech Corp., 216 A.D.2d 505; Gaeta v. City of New York, 213 A.D.2d 509; Pirillo v. Longwood Assocs., 179 A.D.2d 744).

O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curran v. Fresh Meadows Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Curran v. Fresh Meadows Country Club

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CURRAN et al., Appellants, v. FRESH MEADOWS COUNTRY CLUB, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

RISUCCI v. ZEAL MANAGEMENT CORP

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by refusing to consider the plaintiff's…