From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curran v. Fla. Prob. and Parole Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 8, 1986
498 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. BK-306.

December 8, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County; J. Lewis Hall, Judge.

Joe R. Curran, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


The denial of appellant's petition for writ of mandamus is affirmed. However, as in Harris v. State, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we certify the following as being a question of great public importance:

DOES SECTION 57.081 FLA. STAT. AUTHORIZE OR REQUIRE THAT INDIGENT APPELLANTS IN NONCRIMINAL APPEALS BE PROVIDED WITH TRANSCRIPTS AT NO COST TO THEM?

ERVIN, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curran v. Fla. Prob. and Parole Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 8, 1986
498 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Curran v. Fla. Prob. and Parole Comm

Case Details

Full title:JOE R. CURRAN, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PROBATION AND PAROLE COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 8, 1986

Citations

498 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Unemployment Appeals Com'n v. Gretz

As in Roberts and Martinez, we deem the issue presented in this case to be of great public importance and…

Roberts v. Unemployment Appeals Comm

We believe that there is no statute or rule provision which obliges the Commission to prepare the transcripts…