Opinion
2022-60141 Motion 2021-04294
01-06-2022
Dorothy Cupka, Jeffrey Smith, Flor Herrera-Picasso, Eduardo Picasso and Nilunda Rasonmath, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Remik Holdings LLC, Defendant-Respondent. Index No. 159054/18 Nos. 2021-01865, 2021-01868
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
Present - Hon. Dianne T. Renwick, Justice Presiding, David Friedman Anil C. Singh Peter H. Moulton Julio Rodriguez III, Justices.
Appeals having been taken to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about April 30, 2020 (Case No. 2021-01865), and from an order, same court, entered on or about December 09, 2020 (Case No. 2021-01868), and said appeals having been consolidated and perfected, And defendant-respondent having moved to strike plaintiffs-appellants' reply brief or, in the alternative, to permit defendant-respondent to file a sur-reply brief addressing alleged improprieties in plaintiffs-appellants' reply brief, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted to the extent of deeming Points III (Pages 18-22) and IV (Pages 23-25) stricken from plaintiffs-appellants' reply brief and is otherwise denied.