From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. On Deck Capital, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 28, 2021
20-cv-10621 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-10621 (AJN)

06-28-2021

Craig Cunningham, Plaintiff, v. On Deck Capital, Inc., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALISON J. NATHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On May 17, 2021, Plaintiff Craig Cunningham filed an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 12. On May 28, 2021, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. Dkt. No. 15. As of the date of this order, the Court has not received Plaintiff's opposition to the Defendants' motion to dismiss. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the motion to dismiss or file a letter indicating that no opposition will be filed by July 19, 2021. If Plaintiff files an opposition, Defendants' reply, if any, is due July 26, 2021. If Plaintiff opts not to file an opposition, the motion will be deemed unopposed.

Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Baptiste v. Sommers, 768 F.3d 212, 216 (2d Cir. 2014) (Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the district court to dismiss an action “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the] rules or a court order.”).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cunningham v. On Deck Capital, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 28, 2021
20-cv-10621 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Cunningham v. On Deck Capital, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Craig Cunningham, Plaintiff, v. On Deck Capital, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

20-cv-10621 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2021)