From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 16, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-129

12-16-2013

CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, v. ERNIE MOORE, Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution Respondent.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner Charles Cunningham's Petition for Rehearing to Reconsider the Court's decisions of October 21 and 25, 2013 (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED.

_________________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 16, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, v. ERNIE MOORE, Warden, Lebanon…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Dec 16, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 16, 2013)