From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Mahurin

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Aug 20, 2019
588 S.W.3d 519 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107577

08-20-2019

Kristy CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. Jerrod MAHURIN, Respondent.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, David M. Duree, 312 South Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 1416, O'Fallon, IL 62269, DAVID M. DURERE & ASSOCIATES. ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT, Mark Hanson Zoole, P.O. Box 190549, St. Louis, MO 63119, Mark Zoole & Associates.


ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, David M. Duree, 312 South Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 1416, O'Fallon, IL 62269, DAVID M. DURERE & ASSOCIATES.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT, Mark Hanson Zoole, P.O. Box 190549, St. Louis, MO 63119, Mark Zoole & Associates.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kristy Cunningham appeals from the "Final Judgment" dismissing with prejudice her petition for abuse of process against Jerrod Mahurin, the St. Francois County Prosecutor. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Mahurin

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Aug 20, 2019
588 S.W.3d 519 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Mahurin

Case Details

Full title:Kristy CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. Jerrod MAHURIN, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Aug 20, 2019

Citations

588 S.W.3d 519 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)