Opinion
211 CA 15-00802
03-25-2016
DARA R. CUNNINGHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARLYN C. CUNNINGHAM, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. ???????????????????????? IN THE MATTER OF DARA R. CUNNINGHAM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ARLYN C. CUNNINGHAM, JR., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT. J. SCOTT PORTER, SENECA FALLS, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. TIFFANY M. SORGEN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, CANANDAIGUA.
PRESENT:
MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
J. SCOTT PORTER, SENECA FALLS, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
TIFFANY M. SORGEN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, CANANDAIGUA.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Yates County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), dated July 24, 2014. The order, inter alia, awarded sole legal custody of the parties' child to defendant-respondent and dismissed plaintiff-petitioner's family offense petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal insofar as it challenges the award of custody to defendant-respondent is unanimously dismissed, and the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Cunningham v Cunningham ([appeal No. 3] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 25, 2016]).
Entered: March 25, 2016
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court