From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 29, 2023
No. 5656-23S (U.S.T.C. Nov. 29, 2023)

Opinion

5656-23S

11-29-2023

STEPHEN K. CUNNINGHAM, JR., & MEGHANN R. CUNNINGHAM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

Adam B. Landy, Special Trial Judge.

On November 22, 2023, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision and Settlement Stipulation. The caption on the Proposed Stipulated Decision contains an error. The Court is therefore unable to process the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision.

In view of the foregoing, and to give effect to the agreement of the parties in this case, it is hereby

ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision (Doc. 9) is recharacterized and treated as the parties' Supplement to Settlement Stipulation. It is further

ORDERED AND DECIDED: That there is a deficiency in income tax due from petitioners for the taxable year 2020 in the amount of $7,403.00, and that there is an overpayment in income tax due to petitioners for the taxable year 2020 in the amount of $911.00, which amount was paid after the mailing of the notice of deficiency; and

That there is no penalty due from petitioners for the taxable year 2020, under the provisions of I.R.C. § 6662(a).


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 29, 2023
No. 5656-23S (U.S.T.C. Nov. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN K. CUNNINGHAM, JR., & MEGHANN R. CUNNINGHAM, Petitioners v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Nov 29, 2023

Citations

No. 5656-23S (U.S.T.C. Nov. 29, 2023)