From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Cansler

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 6, 1971
123 Ga. App. 614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

46065.

ARGUED MARCH 3, 1971.

DECIDED APRIL 6, 1971.

Appellate procedure. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Etheridge.

Woodruff, Savell, Lane Williams, Edward L. Savell, William S. Goodman, for appellants.

Vernon W. Duncan, Frank D. Schaffer, for appellees.


This appeal is from an order sustaining the motion of the third-party defendants to dismiss the third-party complaint against them. In this respect we note that the trial judge relied on United States v. Jollimore, 2 FRD 148, to support his action, but Rule 14 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in effect at that time included provisions which had been eliminated before the rule was adopted in this State. See the discussion in Koppers Co. v. Parks, 120 Ga. App. 551 ( 171 S.E.2d 639).

Inasmuch as the order here invoked does not qualify as a final judgment it is appealable only if supported by a 10-day certificate conforming to the requirements of the 1968 amendment to the Appellate Practice Act, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073 ( Code Ann. § 6-701 (a, 2)). D. Davis Co. v. Plunkett, 119 Ga. App. 453 ( 167 S.E.2d 663).

The certificate is dated November 17, 1970, "Nunc Pro Tunc Monday, November 16, 1970" and purports to certify an order of November 6, 1970. There is nothing in the record to support the assertion of counsel to the effect that the trial judge was "amending" the record by reducing to writing a certificate which had previously existed only as an oral statement so as to reflect accurately what had actually occurred. See Israel v. Joe Redwine Ins. Agency, 120 Ga. App. 14 ( 169 S.E.2d 347); and Baxter v. Long, 122 Ga. App. 500 (4) ( 177 S.E.2d 712).

The time for a certificate having expired, the nunc pro tunc certificate as here disclosed by the record was without efficacy to support the appeal.

Appeal dismissed. Quillian and Evans, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MARCH 3, 1971 — DECIDED APRIL 6, 1971.


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Cansler

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 6, 1971
123 Ga. App. 614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Cansler

Case Details

Full title:CUNNINGHAM et al. v. CANSLER et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 6, 1971

Citations

123 Ga. App. 614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
181 S.E.2d 922

Citing Cases

Whitlock v. State

A nunc pro tunc entry of a certificate for immediate review cannot revive a right of appeal which has…

Foster v. State

See Van Schallern v. Stanco, 130 Ga.App. 687 (204 S.E.2d 317) (1974) ("[A] certificate for the immediate…