From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. 360 Health Servs.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Dec 6, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-cv-109-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20-cv-109-ALM-KPJ

12-06-2022

CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. 360 HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AMOS L. MAZZANT, DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 4, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (the “Report”) (Dkt. #38) that Plaintiff Craig Cunningham's “Status Report and Motion for Transfer Venue” (the “Motion”) (Dkt. #33) be denied. See Dkt. #38.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. #33) is DENIED.

SIGNED


Summaries of

Cunningham v. 360 Health Servs.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Dec 6, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-cv-109-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Cunningham v. 360 Health Servs.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. 360 HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:20-cv-109-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Dec. 6, 2022)