From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cumbess v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 27, 1978
246 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. 1978)

Opinion

33531.

SUBMITTED MAY 9, 1978.

DECIDED JUNE 27, 1978.

Hunting deer with dogs; constitutional question. Echols Superior Court. Before Judge Horkan.

A. W. Touchton, for appellant.

H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Richard W. Shelton, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The appellants were convicted in the County Court of Echols County of violations of the Game and Fish Code (Code Ann. Title 45; Ga. L. 1977, p. 396 et seq.). Their "appeal" and motion to dismiss the charges against them, filed in the Superior Court of Echols County, were properly treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, as questions of law only were involved. Toole v. Edmondson Seay, 104 Ga. 776 ( 31 S.E. 25) (1898).

The judgment of the superior court denying the appellants' motion must be affirmed because (1) the petition was not in compliance with the procedural requirements of the Act providing for certiorari from the County Court of Echols County (Ga. L. 1953, pp. 3195, 3207, § 12); (2) the constitutional attacks on Code Ann. §§ 45-515 and 45-517 (Ga. L. 1977, pp. 396, 456) and Code Ann. Title 45 generally, were waived by not having been made at the first opportunity in the County Court of Echols County ( Edwards v. City of Albany, 136 Ga. App. 488 (1) ( 221 S.E.2d 681) (1975) and cits.); and (3) the appellants' failure to raise the issue of the absence or insufficiency of their accusations, in either the county court or the superior court, forecloses review of the issues on appeal. Zirkle v. State, 235 Ga. 289, 292 (2) ( 219 S.E.2d 389) (1975) and cits.

Under a line of cases of both the Court of Appeals and this court, the appellants' payment of the fine imposed by the judgment from which they appeal would make the issues sought to be raised moot. See Edwards v. City of Albany, supra, (2) and cits.; Gunn v. State, 139 Ga. App. 654 ( 229 S.E.2d 74) (1976) and cits., including Brown v. City of Atlanta, 123 Ga. 497 (3) ( 51 S.E. 507) (1905). As to the effect of subsequent cases of the Supreme Court of the United States and of this court, see Chaplin v. State, 141 Ga. App. 788 (1) ( 234 S.E.2d 330) (1977) and cits., overruling Division 2 of Edwards, supra, and similar cases of the Court of Appeals. See also Jefferson v. State, 141 Ga. App. 712 (1) ( 234 S.E.2d 333) (1977); Pressley v. State, 142 Ga. App. 701 (1) ( 237 S.E.2d 8) (1977).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED MAY 9, 1978 — DECIDED JUNE 27, 1978.


Summaries of

Cumbess v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 27, 1978
246 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. 1978)
Case details for

Cumbess v. State

Case Details

Full title:CUMBESS et al. v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jun 27, 1978

Citations

246 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. 1978)
246 S.E.2d 186

Citing Cases

Peach v. State

While we are unable to ascertain the correctness of the suggestion of mootness, nevertheless, it is clear…