From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cumberledge v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2014
Case No. 1:13 CV 2067 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13 CV 2067

12-10-2014

Todd B. Cumberledge, Petitioner, v. Brigham Sloan, Warden Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed November 17, 2014 (Doc. 10). The R&R recommends this Court dismiss Cumberledge's Petition as procedurally defaulted.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Petitioner's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no request for an extension has been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court dismisses the Petition with prejudice. This Court further certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jack Zouhary

JACK ZOUHARY

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

December 10, 2014


Summaries of

Cumberledge v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2014
Case No. 1:13 CV 2067 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Cumberledge v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:Todd B. Cumberledge, Petitioner, v. Brigham Sloan, Warden Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 10, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:13 CV 2067 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Turner

windfall upon the defendant whose counsel promptly failed to notify the defendant of a decision.Smith, 463…