From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cumber v. Cumber

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Oct 4, 2010
10-CV-363-ST (D. Or. Oct. 4, 2010)

Opinion

10-CV-363-ST.

October 4, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#22) on July 15, 2010, in which she recommends this Court grant Defendant's Motion (#7) to Dismiss, deny as moot Defendant's alternative Motion (#7) to Transfer, deny as moot Plaintiffs' Motion (#5) to Stay and for Entry of Default, and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Shiny Rock Min. Corp v. U.S., 825 F.2d 216, 218. (9th Cir. 1987). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#22). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#7) to Dismiss, DENIES as moot Defendant's alternative Motion (#7) to Transfer, DENIES as moot Plaintiffs' Motion (#5) to Stay and for Entry of Default, and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 4th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Cumber v. Cumber

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Oct 4, 2010
10-CV-363-ST (D. Or. Oct. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Cumber v. Cumber

Case Details

Full title:GREG CUMBER, Plaintiff, v. TERRY CUMBER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Oct 4, 2010

Citations

10-CV-363-ST (D. Or. Oct. 4, 2010)