From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuellar v. Wellpath, LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 13, 2023
1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC)

07-13-2023

TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, Plaintiff, v. WELLPATH, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WITHIN TWENTY DAYS WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Plaintiff Travis Justin Cuellar is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On April 5, 2023, the parties reached a settlement agreement which was placed on the record. On April 6, 2023, the Court directed the parties to file dispositional documents within thirty days, i.e., on or before May 8, 2023. (ECF No. 45.) However, the parties failed to file the dispositional documents and an order to show cause was issued on May 9, 2023. (ECF No. 46.)

On May 10, 2023, Defendant filed a response to the order to show cause and submits following the completion of the settlement conference, the dispositional documents were sent to Plaintiff. The parties had a telephone converse in which Plaintiff discussed and addressed a typographical error. However, Plaintiff had not signed and returned the dispositional documents, and Defendant “expect[ed] that Plaintiff will follow through on his commitment to return the executed papers.” (ECF No. 47.) Therefore, on May 11, 2023, the Court discharged the order to show cause and granted the parties thirty days to submit dispositional documents. (ECF No. 48.) After no documents were filed, on June 13, 2023, the Court directed Defendant to file a status report. (ECF No. 49.)

Defendant filed a status report on June 14, 2023, indicating that counsel “has repeatedly and persistently called the plaintiff's telephone number and in each instance the call resulted in a voice mail message that here was no answer and that the voice mail message for plaintiff was full, providing no opportunity to leave a message.” (ECF No. 50 at 1.) In addition, there has been no response to e-mail messages sent to Plaintiff's e-mail address. (Id.)

On June 20, 2023, the Court set the case for a status conference on July 13, 2023. (ECF No. 51.)

On July 5, 2023, the Court emailed Plaintiff the meeting id and passcode information for the hearing. (ECF No. 52.)

At the hearing on July 13, 2023, Jerome Varanini appeared on behalf of Defendant Wellpath, LLC, and Plaintiff did not appear for the hearing. Counsel Varanini indicated that the status of the case remained the same in that Plaintiff's voice mail message is still full and there has no email communication from Plaintiff, despite counsel's efforts. Consequently, this case is at a standstill and cannot proceed without Plaintiff's cooperation and participation.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute; and

2. Plaintiff s failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cuellar v. Wellpath, LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 13, 2023
1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Cuellar v. Wellpath, LLC

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, Plaintiff, v. WELLPATH, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 13, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2023)