From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuellar v. Gustaveson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 1, 2023
1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC)

02-01-2023

TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, Plaintiff, v. GUSTAVESON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ON APRIL 5, 2023, AT 9:30 A.M.

(ECF NO. 41)

Plaintiff Travis Justin Cuellar is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

This action proceeds on Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim against Defendants Doctor Gustaveson and Nurse Deborah Massetti.

On February 1, 2023, District Judge Ana de Alba vacated the pretrial conference and jury trial dates and referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge to schedule a settlement conference.

Accordingly, this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe to conduct a video settlement conference, via the Zoom videoconferencing application, on April 5, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.

The parties shall contact Courtroom Deputy Esther Valdez at (559) 499-5788 or email at valdez@caed.uscourts.gov for the video and dial-in information, including any necessary passcodes, for all parties.

The parties shall each submit to Judge McAuliffe a confidential settlement conference statement, as described below, to arrive at least seven days (one week) prior to the conference.

The Court puts the parties on notice that if Plaintiff has any outstanding criminal restitution obligation, fines and/or penalties, these settlement negotiations shall not be geared towards what the restitution obligation is, but what the value of the case itself is to each side, irrespective of any outstanding restitution obligation.

Defendants shall be prepared to negotiate the merits of the case and offer more than a waiver of costs as a reasonable compromise to settle the case. The parties are also informed that an offer of dismissal in exchange for a waiver of costs is not considered good faith settlement negotiations.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This case is set for a video settlement conference, via the Zoom videoconferencing application, before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on April 5, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement shall attend via the Zoom videoconferencing application .

In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the evolving coronavirus protocols, the Court may issue an order at a later date requiring the parties to appear in person.

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. The failure or refusal of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person may result in the cancellation of the conference and the imposition of sanctions.

4. Defendants shall provide a confidential settlement statement to the following email address: bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement statement to U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California 93721, “Attention: Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.” The envelope shall be marked “Confidential Settlement Statement.” Settlement statements shall arrive no later than March 29, 2023. Parties shall also file a Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement (See Local Rule 270(d)). Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “Confidential” with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.

5. The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

6. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

a. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
b. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and trial.
c. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
d. A brief statement of each party's expectations and goals for the settlement conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay.
e. If parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above, including case number(s) if applicable.

7. If a settlement is reached at any point prior to the settlement conference date, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement in accordance with Local Rule 160.

8. The parties remain obligated to keep the Court informed of their current address at all times during the stay and while the action is pending. Any change of address must be reported promptly to the Court in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of Change of Address.” See Local Rule 182(f).

9. A failure to follow these procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions by the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cuellar v. Gustaveson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 1, 2023
1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Cuellar v. Gustaveson

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, Plaintiff, v. GUSTAVESON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00960-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)