From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CTP Innovations, LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 21, 2016
2016-1665 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 21, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1665

12-21-2016

CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC, Appellant v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, AGFA CORP., ESKO SOFTWARE BVBA, HEIDELBERG, USA, Appellees

SAMUEL FLINT MILLER, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Nashville, TN, argued for appellant. Also represented by WAYNE EDWARD RAMAGE, MAIA T. WOODHOUSE; JOSHUA TROPPER, Atlanta, GA. SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER RICCIUTI.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00789.

JUDGMENT

SAMUEL FLINT MILLER, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Nashville, TN, argued for appellant. Also represented by WAYNE EDWARD RAMAGE, MAIA T. WOODHOUSE; JOSHUA TROPPER, Atlanta, GA. SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER RICCIUTI. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 21, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

CTP Innovations, LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 21, 2016
2016-1665 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 21, 2016)
Case details for

CTP Innovations, LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Case Details

Full title:CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC, Appellant v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, AGFA CORP., ESKO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 21, 2016

Citations

2016-1665 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 21, 2016)