From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. Steve Bauer Constr., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 27, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-751 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-751

2013-09-27

VICTOR LEONAL GARCIA CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. STEVE BAUER CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Defendant.


Weber, J.

Bowman, M.J.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This civil action is now before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. (Doc. 8). The Clerk entered default after Defendant failed to answer or otherwise plead in this matter. (Doc. 7). Defendant has not responded to or opposed Plaintiff's motion for judgment.

Plaintiff's complaint asserts that he worked as a laborer for Defendant Steve Bauer Construction, LLC, building stadium seating in high schools around the state of Ohio. (Doc. 3). Plaintiff was one of six laborers paid $11.00 per hour for such work by Defendant. The Complaint asserts that Plaintiff was never paid overtime hours from April 24, 2010 through September 3, 2011. According to an investigation by the Department of Labor, Defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay overtime hours to its employees, including $1,540.00 owned to Plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks an award of his past-due overtime pay as well as liquidated damages (double the amount of unpaid wages) for a total amount of $3,081.00.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) permits the Court to enter a default judgment, with or without an evidentiary hearing if a defendant has been defaulted for failure to appear or defend the action. The undersigned has reviewed the pleadings in this matter and does not doubt the truth of the allegations contained in Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff is requesting a sum certain and the FLSA clearly authorizes liquidated damages in cases such as this. Thus, the undersigned is satisfied that a hearing is not required, with the condition that Plaintiff file a sworn statement and/or affidavit witnessed by a notary public attesting to the facts contained in the Complaint within 14 days of the filing of this Report and Recommendation.

The award of liquidated damages in FLSA cases is governed by 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), which states in pertinent part:

Any employer who violates the provisions of section 206 or section 207 of this title [minimum wage or overtime provisions] shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation, as the case may be, and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages. Any employer who violates the provisions of section 215(a)(3) of this title [retaliation provision] shall be liable for such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to effectuate the purposes of section 215(a)(3) of this title, including without limitation employment, reinstatement, promotion, and the payment of wages lost and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages.

Accordingly, it is therefore RECOMMENDED Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. 8) be granted, conditionally, as outlined above, and judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Steve Bauer Construction, LLC, in the amount of $3,081.00, together with costs and post-judgment interest accruing at the legal rate.

____________________

Stephanie K. Bowman

United States Magistrate Judge
VICTOR LEONAL GARCIA CRUZ, Plaintiff,

v.
STEVE BAUER CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Defendant.

Case No. 1:12-cv-751


Weber, J.

Bowman, M.J.


NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to this Report & Recommendation ("R&R") within 14 DAYS of the filing date of this R&R. That period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion by either side for an extension of time. All objections shall specify the portion(s) of the R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party shall respond to an opponent's objections within 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of those objections. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6thCir. 1981).

29 U.S.C. § 216(b).


Summaries of

Cruz v. Steve Bauer Constr., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 27, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-751 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Cruz v. Steve Bauer Constr., LLC

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR LEONAL GARCIA CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. STEVE BAUER CONSTRUCTION, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-751 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 27, 2013)