Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-297
04-30-2020
HUMBERTO ROSALES CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby's Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R), entered on March 9, 2020. (D.E. 36). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Complaint. (D.E. 31).
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015).
Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 36). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Complaint. (D.E. 31).
SIGNED and ORDERED this 30th day of April 2020.
/s/_________
DAVID S. MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE