From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1993
192 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

April 1, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.).


Plaintiff's failure to supply the name of a notice witness was inadvertent, and defendant is not prejudiced because it has been given a further opportunity to depose plaintiff. Therefore, there is no need to preclude introduction of the witness' testimony at trial.

Summary judgment was properly denied since the witness' affidavit concerning the substance that allegedly caused the plaintiff's fall created a triable issue as to whether the defendant had actual or constructive notice.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Cruz v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1993
192 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Cruz v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN CRUZ, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 449

Citing Cases

Rancano v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Plaintiff's submissions raise an issue of fact as to whether the corridor in which she fell was dangerously…

Acevedo v. York International Corp.

" He concluded: "The oily film on the floor was in the same area that I had seen the York employees working…