From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. Jones

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 2, 2024
2:24-cv-00410-FMO-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00410-FMO-JDE

07-02-2024

BRIAN THOMAS CRUZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GENA JONES, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN United States District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records and files herein, including the operative First Amended Petition (Dkt. 16, “FAP”), Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Ground Six of the FAP (Dkt. 17, “Motion”), Petitioner's Opposition to the Motion (Dkt. 20), Respondent's Reply (Dkt. 21), and the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Dkt. 23, “Report”). No party filed timely objections to the Report. The Court accordingly accepts the Report's findings and recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Ground Six (Dkt. 17) is GRANTED;

(2) Ground Six of the operative FAP is dismissed with prejudice and the dismissal shall be reflected in the final judgment; and

(3) Respondent is ORDERED to file an Answer addressing the remaining claims in the FAP within thirty-five (35) days of the date of this Order, lodging with the Court all records bearing on the merits of Petitioner's remaining claims to the extent such records have not already been lodged.


Summaries of

Cruz v. Jones

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 2, 2024
2:24-cv-00410-FMO-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Cruz v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN THOMAS CRUZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GENA JONES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 2, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00410-FMO-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)