From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruthrids v. Maine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jan 22, 2021
No. 1:20-cv-00249-GZS (D. Me. Jan. 22, 2021)

Opinion

No. 1:20-cv-00249-GZS

01-22-2021

CLEVELAND O. CRUTHRIDS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MAINE, Respondent


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 5, 2021, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 13). Petitioner filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 14) on January 19, 2021.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.

2. It is ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

3. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254 (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED.
4. It is ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall be denied because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).

/s/ George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge Dated this 22nd day of January, 2021.


Summaries of

Cruthrids v. Maine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jan 22, 2021
No. 1:20-cv-00249-GZS (D. Me. Jan. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Cruthrids v. Maine

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND O. CRUTHRIDS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MAINE, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Jan 22, 2021

Citations

No. 1:20-cv-00249-GZS (D. Me. Jan. 22, 2021)