From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crutcher v. Bolling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 11, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-01422-KOB-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 11, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-01422-KOB-JHE

07-11-2017

PEARA CRUTCHER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BOLLING, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation on May 18, 2017, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 7). No party filed any objections.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court finds, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), that this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The court will enter a separate Final Order.

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

KARON OWEN BOWDRE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Crutcher v. Bolling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 11, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-01422-KOB-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Crutcher v. Bolling

Case Details

Full title:PEARA CRUTCHER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BOLLING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 11, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-01422-KOB-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 11, 2017)