From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crozier v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1917
178 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

May, 1917.


In an action to enforce restitution and recovery, at the suit of a taxpayer, for collusive audit or payment, collusion is the gravamen of the action. Collusion not being proved, it is unnecessary in this action to decide the legality of the claims. The judgment is affirmed, with costs, on authority of Daly v. Haight ( 170 App. Div. 469). Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Crozier v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1917
178 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

Crozier v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES J. CROZIER and All Others, etc., Taxpayers of the Town of Islip…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1917

Citations

178 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)