Summary
affirming summary judgment the Court granted to Ball on grounds of non-infringement
Summary of this case from Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. v. Crown Packaging Tech., Inc.Opinion
2012-1258
12-05-2012
CROWN PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND CROWN CORK & SEAL USA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
DALE M. HEIST, Woodcock Washburn LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ALBERT J. MARVELLINO and AARON B. RABINOWITZ. JOHN D. LUKEN, Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, of Cincinnati, ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JOSHUA A. LORENTZ.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in case no. 05-CV-0281, Judge Walter H. Rice.
JUDGMENT
DALE M. HEIST, Woodcock Washburn LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ALBERT J. MARVELLINO and AARON B. RABINOWITZ.
JOHN D. LUKEN, Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, of Cincinnati, ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JOSHUA A. LORENTZ.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
_______________
Jan Horbaly
Clerk