Opinion
06-21-00005-CR
10-14-2021
CURTIS ANTHONY CROWE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Do Not Publish
Submitted: September 7, 2021
On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 48655-B
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ralph K. Burgess Justice
On December 17, 2020, Curtis Anthony Crowe pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court accepted Crowe's plea, found him guilty of the charged offense, and sentenced him to fifteen years' incarceration. Crowe appeals the conviction and sentence.
In the same proceeding Crowe pled guilty to another aggravated assault with deadly weapon case. Please see our opinion in cause number 06-21-00004-CR.
Crowe's appellate counsel filed a brief that outlined the procedural history of the case, provided a detailed summary of the evidence elicited during the trial court proceedings, and stated that counsel found no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Meeting the requirements of Anders v. California, counsel has provided a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 743-44 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812-13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Crowe's counsel filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal and provided Crowe with a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw. His counsel also informed Crowe of his right to review the record and file a pro se response. On July 2, 2021, the Court notified Crowe that, if he wished to file a pro se response to his counsel's Anders brief, any such response was due on or before August 2, 2021. We received neither a pro se response from Crowe nor a motion requesting an extension of time in which to file such a response.
Counsel sent Crowe a copy of the reporter's and clerk's records.
We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have reviewed the entire appellate record and have independently determined that no reversible error exists. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). However, in Anders cases, appellate courts "have the authority to reform judgments and affirm as modified in cases where there is nonreversible error." Ferguson v. State, 435 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Tex. App.-Waco 2014, pet. struck) (comprehensively discussing appellate cases that have modified judgments in Anders cases).
The trial court assessed court costs against Crowe, but the court heard this and another criminal case in a single criminal action. "In a single criminal action in which a defendant is convicted of two or more offenses or multiple counts of the same offense, the court may assess each court cost or fee only once against the defendant." Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 102.073(a). Therefore, we modify the trial court's judgment by deleting $290.00 in court costs and $40.00 in fees.
In the Anders context, once we determine that the appeal is without merit, we must either dismiss the appeal or affirm the trial court's judgment. See Anders, 386 U.S. 738. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court, as modified.
Since we agree that this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel's request to withdraw from further representation of Appellant in this case. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Appellant desire to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Appellant must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review (1) must be filed within thirty days from either the date of this opinion or the date on which the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court, see Tex. R. App. P. 68.2, (2) must be filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, see Tex. R. App. P. 68.3, and (3) should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, see Tex. R. App. P. 68.4.