Crowe v. Gogineni

Full title: KELLY CROWE, Plaintiff, v. RAMA GOGINENI, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2015

2:11-cv-3438 JAM DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2015)

Opinion

KELLY CROWE, Plaintiff, v. RAMA GOGINENI, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-3438 JAM DAD PS United States District Court, E.D. California. October 15, 2015

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

         On August 24, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within seven days after service of the findings and recommendations. The seven-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed August 24, 2015 (Dkt. No. 125) are adopted in full;

         2. Plaintiff's May 1, 2015 motion for sanctions (Dkt. No. 122) is granted; and

         3. Defendant Gogineni's affirmative defenses are stricken.