From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crowder v. LinkedIn Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 28, 2023
22-cv-00237-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-00237-HSG

07-28-2023

TODD CROWDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER PARTIALLY LIFTING STAY AND DIRECTING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

In its order on Defendant's first motion to dismiss, the Court stayed discovery in its discretion, noting that it would be prudent to first assess whether any claims were likely to proceed based on Plaintiffs' amendments. See Dkt. No. 64 at 13. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint and Defendant filed another motion to dismiss. See Dkt. Nos. 65, 73. Having considered the parties' arguments in their briefing and at the hearing on the motion on July 27, 2023, the Court LIFTS the discovery stay only to the limited extent set forth below. See Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988) (“The district court has wide discretion in controlling discovery.”). Defendant is ORDERED to produce to Plaintiffs any private API agreements between LinkedIn and HootSuite, Amobee, Annalect, Ogilvy, or Sprinklr by August 10, 2023. See Dkt. No. 65 ¶¶ 243, 246. All other discovery beyond the production of these specified private API agreements remains stayed unless otherwise ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crowder v. LinkedIn Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 28, 2023
22-cv-00237-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Crowder v. LinkedIn Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TODD CROWDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 28, 2023

Citations

22-cv-00237-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2023)