From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crow v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Nov 20, 2003
No. 03-03-00266-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2003)

Opinion

No. 03-03-00266-CR.

Filed: November 20, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Bell County, 27th Judicial District No. 54,474, Honorable Martha J. Trudo, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Before Justices KIDD, B. A. SMITH and PURYEAR.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Paul Greg Crow pleaded guilty to burglary of a building. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 30.02 (West Supp. 2003). The district court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to two years in state jail. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Crow v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Nov 20, 2003
No. 03-03-00266-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2003)
Case details for

Crow v. State

Case Details

Full title:Paul Greg CROW, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Nov 20, 2003

Citations

No. 03-03-00266-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2003)