From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crouchman v. Motor City Electric Company

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 29, 2005
474 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2005)

Opinion

No. 127871.

September 29, 2005.


SC: 127871.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that there is coverage where the automobile involved in the accident is not owned by the insured but is furnished to, or available for regular use by the insured. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatements of arguments in application papers. Court of Appeals No. 248419.


Summaries of

Crouchman v. Motor City Electric Company

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 29, 2005
474 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2005)
Case details for

Crouchman v. Motor City Electric Company

Case Details

Full title:CROUCHMAN v. MOTOR CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 29, 2005

Citations

474 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2005)
704 N.W.2d 75