From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosley v. City of Pittsburg

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 17, 2007
Case No. C 05-04051 JSW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C 05-04051 JSW.

September 17, 2007

CHARLES GEERHART (SBN 139769), PAOLI GEERHART, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, DORIS CROSLEY and KENNETH COLLINS.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO TAKE VIDEO DEPOSITION OF SCOTT DYE, MD


The Court has reviewed plaintiffs' letter brief requesting an Order allowing plaintiffs to take a video deposition of plaintiff's expert Dr. Scott Dye. The Court notes that the defendants' counsel has supplied a letter stating that the defense does not oppose plaintiffs' request. Good cause appearing, the Court grants plaintiffs' request. The Court orders as follows: Plaintiffs may take the videotaped deposition of Dr. Dye on a date mutually agreeable to the parties, and the videotaped deposition may be used at the trial in lieu of live testimony by Dr. Dye.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that this deposition is to be for the purposes of obtaining trial testimony only and shall not be used as a vehicle for further discovery.


Summaries of

Crosley v. City of Pittsburg

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 17, 2007
Case No. C 05-04051 JSW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Crosley v. City of Pittsburg

Case Details

Full title:DORIS CROSLEY, and KENNETH COLLINS Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, et…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 17, 2007

Citations

Case No. C 05-04051 JSW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2007)