From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosby v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 16, 1994
640 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1994)

Opinion

No. 82236.

June 16, 1994.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fourth District — No. 92-3427, Okeechobee County.

Michael Jeffries, Neill, Griffin, Jeffries Lloyd, Chartered, Fort Pierce, for petitioner.

George A. Vaka, Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal Banker, P.A., Tampa, for respondent.


We have for review Crosby v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 622 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on certified conflict with Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Phillips, 609 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. The district court in the instant case affirmed the trial court's decision that the Nationwide policy did not afford uninsured motorist coverage to Crosby under the circumstances presented. The district court also noted that the facts of the case were identical to the facts in Phillips but noted that the Phillips court had reached the opposite conclusion. We recently quashed the decision in Phillips on the authority of World Wide Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Welker 640 So.2d 46 (Fla. 1994). See Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 640 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1994). For the reasons expressed in World Wide, we approve the decision in the instant case.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.


Summaries of

Crosby v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 16, 1994
640 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1994)
Case details for

Crosby v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CROSBY, PETITIONER, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 16, 1994

Citations

640 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1994)

Citing Cases

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ferrante

Applying the very straightforward terms of the exclusion, it clearly prevents Ferrante from receiving…