From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosby v. Cushinberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 14, 2010
388 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7919.

Submitted: June 28, 2010.

Decided: July 14, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00366-RAJ-JEB).

Michael Fiztroy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Fiztroy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, Thompson McMullan PC, Richmond, Virginia; Charles Everett James, Jr., Brendan David O'Toole, Williams Mullen, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael Fiztroy Crosby appeals, the district court's order granting summary judgment for Defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) inmate civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crosby v. Cushinberry, No. 2:08-cv-00366-RAJ-JEB (E.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Crosby v. Cushinberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 14, 2010
388 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Crosby v. Cushinberry

Case Details

Full title:Michael Fiztroy CROSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain CUSHINBERRY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

388 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Ruffin

She had no responsibility for hiring or assigning VDOC dental personnel, so to the extent that the delay…