From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Croom v. Oppy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 30, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-439 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-439

09-30-2015

ANTHONY LAMONTE CROOM, Petitioner, v. MICK OPPY, Warden, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. September 30, 2015.

/s/_________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Croom v. Oppy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 30, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-439 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Croom v. Oppy

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LAMONTE CROOM, Petitioner, v. MICK OPPY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-439 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2015)