From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crom v. Walgreen Co.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jun 3, 2015
NO. 2014 CW 1719 (La. Ct. App. Jun. 3, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2014 CW 1719

06-03-2015

MICHAEL R. CROM, SR. v. WALGREEN CO.


In Re: Walgreen Louisiana Co., applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2012-16594. BEFORE: McDONALD, CRAIN AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.

GH

WJC

McDonald, J., dissents. I believe that the defendant, Walgreen Co. ("Walgreens"), met its burden on summary judgment and established that there is no genuine issue as to material fact that plaintiff Michael Crom, Sr. is the borrowed employee of Walgreens and that Walgreens is entitled to summary judgment, as a matter of law. See La. C.C.P. 966 art. (B)(2) & (C)(2). Accordingly, I would grant the writ and dismiss plaintiff's petition with prejudice. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

Crom v. Walgreen Co.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jun 3, 2015
NO. 2014 CW 1719 (La. Ct. App. Jun. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Crom v. Walgreen Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL R. CROM, SR. v. WALGREEN CO.

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 3, 2015

Citations

NO. 2014 CW 1719 (La. Ct. App. Jun. 3, 2015)