Opinion
NO. 3:20-cv-00199
04-09-2021
COREY CROCKETT, Plaintiff, v. DCSO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 20), to which no Objections have been filed.
The failure to object to a report and recommendation releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Frias v. Frias, No. 2:18-cv-00076, 2019 WL 549506, at *2 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 12, 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985)); Hart v. Bee Property Mgmt., Case No. 18-cv-11851, 2019 WL 1242372, at *1 (E.D. Mich. March 18, 2019). The district court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, those aspects of the report and recommendation to which no objection is made. Ashraf v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc., 322 F. Supp. 3d 879, 881 (W.D. Tenn. 2018); Benson v. Walden Security, Case No. 3:18-cv-0010, 2018 WL 6322332, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2018). The district court should adopt the magistrate judge's findings and rulings to which no specific objection is filed. Id.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13) filed by the remaining two Defendants, Chadwick Myatt and Milton Skelton, is GRANTED in part, i.e., granted to the extent that Plaintiff's continued pursuit of this case is hereby conditioned upon his payment of the full filing fee by April 30, 2021. Plaintiff is warned that absent extraordinary circumstances, failure to pay the full filing fee by April 30, 2021, will result in this case being dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
ELI RICHARDSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE