From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crittendon v. Davenport

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 11, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv897-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 11, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv897-MHT (WO)

01-11-2016

RICKEY CRITTENDON, Petitioner, v. CARTER DAVENPORT, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 4) is adopted.

(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1) is denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 11th day of January, 2016.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Crittendon v. Davenport

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 11, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv897-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Crittendon v. Davenport

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY CRITTENDON, Petitioner, v. CARTER DAVENPORT, et al., Respondents.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv897-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 11, 2016)