From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Criswell v. Brinks Signal Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 2, 1972
262 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 1972)

Opinion

No. 41071.

April 26, 1972. Rehearing Denied June 2, 1972.

Writ of certiorari to District Court of Appeal, Second District.

Allgood, McPherson Cobb, New Port Richey, Marks, Gray, Conroy Gibbs, Jacksonville, and Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey, Kinney Boggs, Tampa, for petitioners.

Thomas A. Clark and William F. McGowan, Jr., of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith Cutler, Tampa, for respondent.


By petition for writ of certiorari, we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, 245 So.2d 265, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record, we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and DREW, J. (retired), concur.

ROBERTS, C.J., dissents.


Summaries of

Criswell v. Brinks Signal Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 2, 1972
262 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 1972)
Case details for

Criswell v. Brinks Signal Co.

Case Details

Full title:GROVER C. CRISWELL, D/B/A CRISWELL'S MONEY MUSEUM, PETITIONER, v. BRINKS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 2, 1972

Citations

262 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 1972)