From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crisp v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2827 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-2827 JAM CKD P

04-02-2015

OBIE L. CRISP, III, Plaintiff, v. G. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good cause appearing, this request will be granted. In addition, plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (ECF No. 12) is granted;

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint; and

3. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied. Dated: April 2, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
cris2827.31


Summaries of

Crisp v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2827 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Crisp v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:OBIE L. CRISP, III, Plaintiff, v. G. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 2, 2015

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-2827 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)