In Crisfield v. Perine, 81 N.Y. 622, it is said (it was not necessary so to hold for the decision) that a coroner's inquest is a judicial proceeding and within the spirit of the statute.
Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Kenney v. CornellArgued April 9, 1880
Decided April 20, 1880
Charles J. Bissell for appellant.
John A. Van Derlip for respondent.
Affirmed on opinion in court below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Crisfield v. Perine, 81 N.Y. 622, it is said (it was not necessary so to hold for the decision) that a coroner's inquest is a judicial proceeding and within the spirit of the statute.
Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Kenney v. CornellFull title:JAMES E. CRISFIELD, Appellant, v . FRANCIS M. PERINE, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 20, 1880
In other words, the Federal courts in passing upon the right to a public trial construe against the Sixth…
United States v. HeroldThe law of New York describes some of the instances when a judge for various good and common-sense reasons in…