Opinion
2001-07709
Submitted April 23, 2002.
May 13, 2002.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant John D. Goldstein appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), dated July 11, 2001, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
McCarl Harris, Montgomery, N.Y. (James R. McCarl of counsel), for appellant.
Richard J. Weiner, P.C., Nanuet, N.Y. (Neil S. Weiner of counsel), for respondents.
Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The evidence submitted in connection with the appellant's motion reveals the existence of triable issues of fact as to whether the appellant violated section 1160(b) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, or was otherwise negligent in attempting to "cut the corner" while making a left-hand turn in the vicinity of the injured plaintiff's vehicle (see Boylan v. Whitehouse, 229 A.D. 372; Marshall v. Richter, 227 A.D. 830; cf. Dame v. Hanly, 16 A.D.2d 997, 998) and, if he was negligent, whether such negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308; Mitchum v. Friend, 270 A.D.2d 841; Gross v. New York City Tr. Auth., 256 A.D.2d 128, 130; Calderone v. Harrel, 237 A.D.2d 318; Ferguson v. Gassman, 229 A.D.2d 464, 465; Brogan v. Zummo, 92 A.D.2d 533, 535; cf. Sheehan v. City of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 496, 503; Dormena v. Wallace, 282 A.D.2d 425, 427; Fiscella v. Gibbs, 261 A.D.2d 572, 573-574).
The Supreme Court therefore properly denied that branch of the appellant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
RITTER, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and CRANE, JJ., concur.