From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crippen v. Jok

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 20, 2022
3:20-cv-00561 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00561

01-20-2022

EDDIE CRIPPEN, Plaintiff, v. MAWELL JOK, Defendant.


HOLMES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

ORDER

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 46), which was filed on October 04, 2021. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 32) be denied and that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of excessive force against Defendant be set for a jury trial. Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 32) is DENIED. The Court will set a trial date by separate order.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crippen v. Jok

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 20, 2022
3:20-cv-00561 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Crippen v. Jok

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE CRIPPEN, Plaintiff, v. MAWELL JOK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-00561 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 20, 2022)