From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crews v. Crews

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 12, 1950
61 S.E.2d 144 (Ga. 1950)

Opinion

17193.

SEPTEMBER 12, 1950.

Discovery. Before Judge Thomas. Ware Superior Court. May 12, 1950.

Joe Schreiber, for plaintiff in error.

C. V. Stanton, contra.


The only exception is to the overruling of a general demurrer to the petition. The demurrer was overruled May 12, 1950, and exceptions pendente lite were filed and allowed May 15, 1950. On May 18, 1950, the present bill of exceptions was presented and certified. Held:

The losing party has the option of reviewing a judgment on demurrer by direct bill of exceptions, or to have certified and filed exceptions pendente lite. If pendente lite exceptions are filed, the ruling on demurrer is reviewable only after the termination of the case in a bill of exceptions assigning error on the final judgment. Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S.E. 841); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S.E. 505); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S.E. 699); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 (3) ( 21 S.E.2d 643); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S.E.2d 149). The ruling on demurrer having been excepted to pendente lite, the writ of error is prematurely brought to this court and the motion to dismiss the same is sustained.

( a) This rule does not injure the demurrant. If the trial results in a judgment against him, a review of the rulings on demurrer may be had by assigning error on the pendente lite exceptions in a bill of exceptions to the final judgment.

Writ of error dismissed. All the Justices concur.

No. 17193. SEPTEMBER 12, 1950.


Summaries of

Crews v. Crews

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 12, 1950
61 S.E.2d 144 (Ga. 1950)
Case details for

Crews v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:CREWS v. CREWS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 12, 1950

Citations

61 S.E.2d 144 (Ga. 1950)
61 S.E.2d 144

Citing Cases

Shirley v. State

It is the duty of this court upon its own motion to raise the question of its jurisdiction in all cases.…

Cordele Sash, Door Lumber v. Prudential Ins. Co.

While the losing party, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and this court, has the option of having…