From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crenshaw v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
308 So. 3d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2570

12-18-2020

Phillip CRENSHAW, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Phillip Crenshaw, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Phillip Crenshaw, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court notes Petitioner's response docketed October 19, 2020. The order to show cause of October 5, 2020, is hereby discharged.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Financial, Inc. , 219 So. 3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that where the threshold requirement of irreparable harm is not established, the petition for writ of certiorari must be dismissed).

Osterhaus, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crenshaw v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
308 So. 3d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Crenshaw v. State

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP CRENSHAW, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Dec 18, 2020

Citations

308 So. 3d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)