From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crehan v. Louisiana

Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 2020
140 S. Ct. 2713 (2020)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Crehan v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 2713, 206 L.Ed.2d 850 (2020), Justice Alito concurred in the judgment with the understanding that in cases in which the United States Supreme Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of Ramos, "the [United States Supreme Court] is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand."

Summary of this case from State v. Jones
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

No. 18-9787.

04-27-2020

Jace CREHAN, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit for further consideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U.S. ––– (2020). Justice Alito, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand: In this and in all other case in which the Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , I concur in the judgment on the understanding that the Court is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand.

Summaries of

Crehan v. Louisiana

Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 2020
140 S. Ct. 2713 (2020)

In Crehan v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 2713, 206 L.Ed.2d 850 (2020), Justice Alito concurred in the judgment with the understanding that in cases in which the United States Supreme Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of Ramos, "the [United States Supreme Court] is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand."

Summary of this case from State v. Jones

In Crehan, this court had previously noted the defendant made "a pro forma challenge to the constitutionality of his non-unanimous guilty verdict."

Summary of this case from State v. Jones

In Crehan v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, ___ S.Ct. ___, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2020), 2020 WL 1978930, Justice Alito concurred in the judgment remanding the case to this court, with the understanding that in such cases in which the United States Supreme Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of Ramos, "the [United States Supreme] Court is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand."

Summary of this case from State v. Warren

In Crehan, this court noted the defendant made "a pro forma challenge to the constitutionality of his non-unanimous guilty verdict."

Summary of this case from State v. Warren
Case details for

Crehan v. Louisiana

Case Details

Full title:Jace CREHAN, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Apr 27, 2020

Citations

140 S. Ct. 2713 (2020)
206 L. Ed. 2d 850

Citing Cases

State v. Warren

See alsoSchriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 351, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 2522, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004) (observing that…

State v. Jones

State v. Bueso, 2019-01675 (La. 6/22/20), 297 So.3d 719 (per curiam) (citingGriffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S.…

2 Citing Cases